Anne van Kesteren (2013-10-18T16:05:17.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-10-24T14:19:37.453Z)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote: > On 18 Oct 2013, at 10:48, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at annevk.nl> wrote: >> When you phrase it like that, I see another problem with >> codePointAt(). You can't just replace existing usage of charCodeAt() >> with codePointAt() as that would fail for input with paired >> surrogates. E.g. a simple loop over a string that prints code points >> would print both the code point and the trail surrogate code point for >> a surrogate pair. > > I disagree. In those situations you should just iterate over the string using `for…of`. That seems to iterate over code units as far as I can tell. for (var x of "💩") print(x.charCodeAt(0)) invokes print() twice in Gecko.