On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jeff Morrison <lbljeffmo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, so I've read most of the "Promise.cast/Promise.resolve" thread and
> it's gone back and forth and branched in topic several times...but now I'm
> a bit confused as to where we sit (and navigating that thread again isn't
> the most exciting idea). So can someone who's been following that thread
> more closely please confirm for (or correct) me that the following is where
> we sit at the moment:
>
> Promise.resolve('hai'); // Promise('hai')
>

If by the comment's notation you mean a promise whose fulfillment is "hai",
yes.
Note though that the call Promise("hai") doesn't do this.



> Promise.resolve(Promise.resolve('hai')); // Promise('hai') <-- is that
> right? I'm not sure where we're at here
>

yes.


>
> Promise.resolve('hai').then(function(value) {
>   console.log(value); // prints 'hai'
> });
>

yes.


>
> Promise.resolve(Promise.resolve('hai')).then(function(value) {
>   console.log(value); // prints 'hai'
> });
>

yes.


>
> Promise.cast === undefined; // true
>

yes. A bit more informatively:

'cast' in Promise; // false



> Promise.prototype.chain === undefined; // true
>

yes. And likewise

'chain' in Promise.prototype; // false


>
> PLEASE do not turn this into another debate thread, I'm really just
> looking for a tldr thread tracking the latest standing on that topic.
> If the standing changes again, feel free to update this thread -- but
> otherwise please keep discussion in the other thread.
>

;)



>
> Thanks!
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140224/a4c94f3a/attachment.html>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jeff Morrison <lbljeffmo at gmail.com> wrote:

> ```js
> Promise.resolve('hai'); // Promise('hai')
> ```

If by the comment's notation you mean a promise whose fulfillment is "hai",
yes.
Note though that the call `Promise("hai")` doesn't do this.



> ```js
> Promise.resolve(Promise.resolve('hai')); // Promise('hai') <-- is that right? I'm not sure where we're at here
> ```

yes.


> ```js
> Promise.resolve('hai').then(function(value) {
>   console.log(value); // prints 'hai'
> });
> ```

yes.

> ```
> Promise.resolve(Promise.resolve('hai')).then(function(value) {
>   console.log(value); // prints 'hai'
> });
> ```

yes.


> ```js
> Promise.cast === undefined; // true
> ```

yes. A bit more informatively:

```js
'cast' in Promise; // false
```

> ```js
> Promise.prototype.chain === undefined; // true
> ```

yes. And likewise

```js
'chain' in Promise.prototype; // false
```

> PLEASE do not turn this into another debate thread, I'm really just
> looking for a tldr thread tracking the latest standing on that topic.
> If the standing changes again, feel free to update this thread -- but
> otherwise please keep discussion in the other thread.

;)