Brendan Eich wrote:
> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> This works great as a general principle, but honestly tons of
>> languages have already forged this path. It's pretty straightforward,
>> I think.
>
> I made the case for building it in sooner, but TC39 wanted "less
> sooner" based on library usage. There was a minority position (as
> voiced; could be majority) that argued JS is different, object
> detection plus optional "fields" means this is the wrong direction.
Not trying to be controversial ;-). Would you use ES6 classes and have
the ones you wrote all extend NoSuchPropertyClass?
/be
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-09-30T16:49:23.907Z)
Not trying to be controversial ;-). Would you use ES6 classes and have
the ones you wrote all extend NoSuchPropertyClass?
