Isaac Schlueter (2012-03-06T18:38:45.000Z)
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:07, Thaddee Tyl <thaddee.tyl at gmail.com> wrote:

> An interesting property of this syntax is that anonymous functions can
>
be written this way:
>
>    myList.forEach(λ (item) { doWith(item) })
>
> (it can also be `lambda (item) { ... }`)
>

Yes, any valid function identifier could be used, because it's not actually
a keyword.

_ (arg) { ... }
f (arg) { ... }
$ (arg) { ... }
ƒ (arg) { ... }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120306/7186b4be/attachment.html>
github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:24:50.338Z)
Yes, any valid function identifier could be used, because it's not actually
a keyword.

    _ (arg) { ... }
    f (arg) { ... }
    $ (arg) { ... }
    ? (arg) { ... }