程劭非 (2012-08-28T03:42:14.000Z)
Yes, as a developer (but not English native speaker), I really feel
uncomfortable with the name “of”.

Considering we already have
    Object.create
    String.fromCharCode

To keep align with them, I belive “create” or “fromElements” might be
better choices.


2012/8/27 Shijun He <hax.sfo at gmail.com>:
> See the screenshots for the "array of" search suggestion in search engine.
> As a non-English native speaker, I'd like to say the search suggestion
> of "array of" in non-english languages seems most come from the
> programmers' input, so it shows how worldwide programmers think what
> "array of" means ;)
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Robb <matthewwrobb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I agree with Rick on the general feeling with Array.of
>>
>> If arguing ambiguity I would argue a better method name for type guarded
>> arrays would be Array.ofType
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>>>
>>> Rick Waldron wrote:
>>>
>>> But Array.of is not. Maybe Array.new is a good name.
>>>
>>> Array.of is unambiguous with the current ES specification
>>>
>>>
>>> Array.new is ok too, though -- no problem with a reserved identifier as
>>> a property name. It's darn nice for Rubyists.
>>>
>>> OTOH Array.of matches the preposition pattern used in Array.from. But I
>>> don't think this trumps Array.new.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nor do I, but I think it poses a problem for polyfilling (which is not a
>>> silver bullet).
>>>
>>> +1 Array.new, but I still think Array.of sounds, feels and looks nicer
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> Cc'ing Dave for his thoughts.
>>>
>>> /be
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-03T16:42:19.161Z)
Yes, as a developer (but not English native speaker), I really feel
uncomfortable with the name “of”.

Considering we already have

- `Object.create`
- `String.fromCharCode`

To keep align with them, I belive “create” or “fromElements” might be
better choices.