Domenic Denicola (2012-12-28T13:49:51.000Z)
On Dec 28, 2012, at 7:36, "David Bruant" <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:

> Le 28/12/2012 13:32, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com> wrote:
>>> That's a good point, actually. I, for one, do not understand the criteria by
>>> which we chose to include __proto__ but not __defineGetter__ and friends.
>> __proto__ is in all browsers
> What? It's not in IE10 and below last I heard

Correct. It seems to me that (modulo Opera? Haven't tested.) __proto__ and __defineGetter__ are supported in exactly the same places. What's the criteria?
github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:26:06.461Z)
On Dec 28, 2012, at 7:36, "David Bruant" <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:

> Le 28/12/2012 13:32, Anne van Kesteren a ?crit :
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com> wrote:
>>> That's a good point, actually. I, for one, do not understand the criteria by
>>> which we chose to include `__proto__` but not `__defineGetter__` and friends.
>> `__proto__` is in all browsers
> What? It's not in IE10 and below last I heard

Correct. It seems to me that (modulo Opera? Haven't tested.) `__proto__` and `__defineGetter__` are supported in exactly the same places. What's the criteria?