On Apr 12, 2013 11:06 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk at annevk.nl> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > The "DOM side" should all be subscribed to es-discuss and read it on a
> > regular basis. Additionally, our f2f meeting notes are a great way for
them
> > to keep up to date, as well as providing a good jump off for questions
and
> > concerns.
>
> Given the number of people working on platform APIs that "should"
> seems ever less likely to become a reality. We need a different
> strategy.

Feels like some tc39 member(s) should be invited experts to anything @w3c
dealing with scripted apis as a checkpoint and that w3c folks should at
least follow es-summary and review f2f notes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130412/bbc211c3/attachment.html>

On Apr 12, 2013 11:06 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk at annevk.nl> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The "DOM side" should all be subscribed to es-discuss and read it on a
> > regular basis. Additionally, our f2f meeting notes are a great way for them
> > to keep up to date, as well as providing a good jump off for questions and
> > concerns.
>
> Given the number of people working on platform APIs that "should"
> seems ever less likely to become a reality. We need a different
> strategy.

Feels like some tc39 member(s) should be invited experts to anything @w3c
dealing with scripted apis as a checkpoint and that w3c folks should at
least follow es-summary and review f2f notes.