Francisco Ferreira (2013-04-16T08:28:09.000Z)
Hi,

Are there plans for a stricter "use strict"? I think everyone can agree
that having "use strict" is already a big improvement compared with not
having it. But can't it be improved?

Stuff that pops my mind that "use strict" doesn't cover and that could be
useful is:
"use stricter";
 - Enforces the use of ';' at the end of a line of code
 - Either force the usage of '===' instead of '==' or make '==' more type
safe.
 - Makes map[undefined] break or throw a warning

Francisco

p.s.: I've been following es-discuss for a month or two, this is the first
time posting here so I hope I'm not covering something massively discussed
already.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130416/d8e889fd/attachment.html>
github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:26:56.945Z)
Are there plans for a stricter `"use strict"`? I think everyone can agree
that having `"use strict"` is already a big improvement compared with not
having it. But can't it be improved?

Stuff that pops my mind that `"use strict"` doesn't cover and that could be useful is:

`"use stricter";`

 - Enforces the use of `;` at the end of a line of code
 - Either force the usage of `===` instead of `==` or make `==` more type safe.
 - Makes `map[undefined]` break or throw a warning

p.s.: I've been following es-discuss for a month or two, this is the first time posting here so I hope I'm not covering something massively discussed already.