Brendan Eich (2013-04-29T16:47:25.000Z)
github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:26:56.528Z)
David Bruant wrote: > Le 29/04/2013 18:09, Brendan Eich a ?crit : >> Users want class-private (and module-private?) syntax. > I'm not up-to-date on the module work, but last I looked at it, > "module private" is everything except what is explicitly exported, no? > (which is a good thing, I believe) This isn't clear for nested modules, or wasn't when they were discussed last. The big win of `private` as a declarative keyword would be its short-hand for `const _ = Symbol()`, combined with checked uses on right of `@`.