Fine. If there are no further objections, the three architectures are
Unabashed Monadic Promises
Q-Like Promises
Abashed Monadic Promises
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Tab, these are the three architectures I am trying to compare in
> order to
> > make a point. Since you don't like the labels I've chosen for them,
> please
> > suggest alternatives that should be clear and acceptable to all so that
> we
> > can resume the conversation. Thanks.
>
> Nobody is suggesting or wants a "pure" monadic option, so it's
> unimportant what you call it.
>
> ~TJ
>
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130510/8f33ddf3/attachment.html>
github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:27:21.356Z)
Fine. If there are no further objections, the three architectures are
- Unabashed Monadic Promises
- Q-Like Promises
- Abashed Monadic Promises
Fine. If there are no further objections, the three architectures are Unabashed Monadic Promises Q-Like Promises Abashed Monadic Promises On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> > wrote: > > Hi Tab, these are the three architectures I am trying to compare in > order to > > make a point. Since you don't like the labels I've chosen for them, > please > > suggest alternatives that should be clear and acceptable to all so that > we > > can resume the conversation. Thanks. > > Nobody is suggesting or wants a "pure" monadic option, so it's > unimportant what you call it. > > ~TJ > -- Cheers, --MarkM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130510/8f33ddf3/attachment.html>