Andreas Rossberg (2013-05-14T15:12:39.000Z)
github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:27:21.721Z)
On 14 May 2013 17:07, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote: > > What about providing a convenience `resume` method on generators to help clarify co-routine style usage? Dave suggested that "resume" was pedagogically useful. > > I would define it equivalently two: > > ```js > resume(...args) {return this.next(...args)} > ``` > > (`resume` rather than `next` delegates to avoid the delegation for normal for-of iterations) Not sure about having two names for the same method, but if so, why not simply make `Generator.prototype.resume === Generator.prototype.next`?