github at esdiscuss.org (2013-07-12T02:27:37.681Z)
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote: > Whoops, I left that out accidentally. Modified (also to use Allen's > for-of rather than forEach): I agree with this and I think these should be added to the pool of methods to consider for Map and Set. The "pool" I refer to includes, but is not limited to: - union - intersect - difference - update (as of now)
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> In particular, I like that it just returns the modified map/set, so > >> it's easy to chain with, or to immediately return. > > > > I was wondering about this while reading your OP, but you're not > returning > > anything in that "desugaring". Anyway, I agree with this reasoning. > > Whoops, I left that out accidentally. Modified (also to use Allen's > for-of rather than forEach): > > Map.prototype.update = function(iter) { > for([k,v] of iter) this.set(k,v); > return this; > }; > Set.prototype.update = function(iter) { > for(v of iter) this.add(v); > return this; > }; > I agree with this and I think these should be added to the pool of methods to consider for Map and Set. The "pool" I refer to includes, but is not limited to: - union - intersect - difference - update (as of now) Rick > > ~TJ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130627/97314461/attachment-0001.html>