On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, I should have checked the specs but that page should be either
> updated or removed.
>

No, you should just read the spec and if you find yourself at the page you
linked to, in big bold letters at the top:

*This proposal has progressed to the Draft ECMAScript 6 Specification,
which is available for review here:
specification_drafts<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts>.
Any new issues relating to them should be filed as bugs at
http://bugs.ecmascript.org*



> Anyway you still didn't convince me generators were needed at all there,
> neither that I can "simply shim iterators" 'cause this makes generators
> pointless in first place if it was so easy to polyfill ... which is not.
>
> The polyfill gonna grow in size for no concrete reason now, can I at least
> ask if current specs about Maps, Sets, and WeakMaps are final?
>

Polyfills don't decide the fate of the future.


Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130711/d178ae4a/attachment-0001.html>

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, I should have checked the specs but that page should be either
> updated or removed.
>

No, you should just read the spec and if you find yourself at the page you
linked to, in big bold letters at the top:

> **This proposal has progressed to the Draft ECMAScript 6 Specification, which is available for review here: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts.**

> **Any new issues relating to them should be filed as bugs at http://bugs.ecmascript.org**

&#160;


> Anyway you still didn't convince me generators were needed at all there,
> neither that I can "simply shim iterators" 'cause this makes generators
> pointless in first place if it was so easy to polyfill ... which is not.
>
> The polyfill gonna grow in size for no concrete reason now, can I at least
> ask if current specs about Maps, Sets, and WeakMaps are final?
>

Polyfills don't decide the fate of the future.