Erik Arvidsson (2013-07-17T00:05:28.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-07-19T15:57:18.067Z)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > ```js > Object.toString(x) > ``` I assume you mean `Object.prototype.toString.call(x)` > ```js > x instanceof DOMError > ``` > Probably doesn't matter what this returns. FWIW, Neither Blink nor WebKit exposes `DOMError` so this should be safe to change (on the open web at least). > I personally think that the second bullet is a bit silly. But since > that appears to be the convention that ES uses then we should stick > with it. Agreed. There will be issues here since DOM has throw a `SyntaxError`, which means throw a `DOMException` with the name `SyntaxError` and the code `DOMException.SYNTAX_ERR` so that would mean that we have a naming conflict since ES already have a `SyntaxError` constructor.