domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-07-23T02:37:01.270Z)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Luke Hoban <lukeh at microsoft.com> wrote: > All current engines I could try return `Number.prototype` for: > > ```js > 12["__proto__"] > ``` > > But the new spec says this should be a `TypeError`. What is the relevant part of the new spec?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Luke Hoban <lukeh at microsoft.com> wrote: > All current engines I could try return Number.prototype for:**** > > ** ** > > 12[“__proto__”]**** > > ** ** > > But the new spec says this should be a TypeError. > What is the relevant part of the new spec? > **** > > ** ** > > It’s more consistent with the other members of Object.prototype to do an > implicit ToObject here, and apparently matches existing implementations. > Is it intentional that the spec is treating this as a TypeError?**** > > ** ** > > Luke**** > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130716/47fafabb/attachment.html>