On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> unique string (uuid or otherwise) suffer same problem if generated in 2
>> different realm unaware of each other.
>>
>
> I meant hard-coding such a well-known unique string into both versions of
> the library.  That solves the problem.
>


And the next step? Someone will hash a well-known string to get their
well-known "unique symbol" and write a blog post calling it a best practice
:)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130731/aaee6eec/attachment.html>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:

> I meant hard-coding such a well-known unique string into both versions of
> the library.  That solves the problem.


And the next step? Someone will hash a well-known string to get their
well-known "unique symbol" and write a blog post calling it a best practice
:)