ES Discuss - Message History

Tab Atkins Jr. (2013-07-31T20:00:26.000Z)

Go to Source

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Juan Ignacio Dopazo
<dopazo.juan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does this all mean that you're ok with having promises-for-promises?

I've always been okay with that.  ^_^  This consensus details how to
handle nested promises (use .flatMap()) *and* how to ignore that and
just get values out of them (use .then()).  Everyone's happy!

~TJ

domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-08-05T20:03:03.258Z)

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Juan Ignacio Dopazo <dopazo.juan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does this all mean that you're ok with having promises-for-promises?

I've always been okay with that.  ^_^  This consensus details how to
handle nested promises (use .flatMap()) *and* how to ignore that and
just get values out of them (use .then()).  Everyone's happy!

Edit