David Bruant (2013-08-02T20:58:39.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-08-05T20:14:58.688Z)
Le 01/08/2013 20:27, Mark S. Miller a écrit : > whatever DOM does quickly becomes a compat constraint on all future decisions (was the comma omitted on purpose? ;-) ) This also means that if there is a delta between the agreement and the implementation, we'll have yet another de facto standard. There are two ways in which this can happen: * misunderstanding of intent * misexpression of (even perfectly-)understood intent. > 1. What should tc39 do quickly, to unblock the DOM's need for promises and avoid a design fork? I apologize for being annoyingly insistent with this, but: tests. An unwanted de facto standard is a de facto design fork. I believe that to a large extent, the risk of both misunderstanding of intent and misexpression understood intent would be largely reduced by a test suite. The people who (will) implement this feature aren't necessarily the ones involved in this, sometimes very subtle, discussion. I believe fewer information would be lost if the latters formalized their agreement in tests for the formers to implement against. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=856410