Actually, I found some notes (
https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-23.md,
thanks).

The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems
refutable/irrefutable feature still is not agreed?

Dmitry


On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Destructuring assignment (aka "non-strict pattern matching") seems was in
> the draft spec for a while.
>
> I'm currently implementing the feature in our local code transforms
> pipeline, and it seemed to me that there is/was already a pretty stable
> agreement on it.
>
> Currently what I see is: irrefutable match with default values (plus,
> spread/rest for arrays). However, I was informed that on the last meeting
> the topic was raised again and the refutable/irrefutable aspects where
> brought to the discussion again.
>
> (it seems like this "refutable/irrefutable" thing was here for couple of
> years already)
>
> I wanted to clarify the current status, how active the topic is, was the
> consensus achieved before, and how likely the current semantics will be
> changed?
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130802/ef548fca/attachment.html>

Actually, I found some notes (
https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-23.md,
thanks).

The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems
refutable/irrefutable feature still is not agreed?