On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:

> Actually, I found some notes (https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-23.md, thanks).
> 
> The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems refutable/irrefutable feature still is not agreed?
> 
> Dmitry
> 

that's pretty much it.  The  RHS ToObjects need to be removed.  Other than that and bugs fixes, I think the spec. as it appears in the Rev16 draft is pretty solid.  Please do implement and report any apparent spec bugs.

Allen







> 
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Destructuring assignment (aka "non-strict pattern matching") seems was in the draft spec for a while.
> 
> I'm currently implementing the feature in our local code transforms pipeline, and it seemed to me that there is/was already a pretty stable agreement on it.
> 
> Currently what I see is: irrefutable match with default values (plus, spread/rest for arrays). However, I was informed that on the last meeting the topic was raised again and the refutable/irrefutable aspects where brought to the discussion again.
> 
> (it seems like this "refutable/irrefutable" thing was here for couple of years already)
> 
> I wanted to clarify the current status, how active the topic is, was the consensus achieved before, and how likely the current semantics will be changed?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130802/b0abdc0e/attachment-0001.html>

that's pretty much it.  The  RHS ToObjects need to be removed.  Other than that and bugs fixes, I think the spec. as it appears in the Rev16 draft is pretty solid.  Please do implement and report any apparent spec bugs.