Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> Andreas Rossberg wrote:
>>> As I said in my reply, I'm totally fine with what you describe in that
>>> mail. But correct me if I'm wrong, that_is_ refutable destructuring,
>>> isn't it? All you seem to drop is the optional irrefutable part (the
>>> '?' feature). That's why I am quite confused about Brendan's statement
>>> above.
>> Possibly I missed something (I was at the meeting on the 2nd and 3rd days but not day 1).
>>
>> Allen, what does your latest draft do on
>>
>> var {p} = {};
>>
>> Throw, or bind p to undefined?
>
> throws
>
> to bind to undefined you would say:
>
> var {p=undefined} = {};
Ok, then!
My apologies, Andreas, I was your champion in reviving refutable
patterns for destructuring in ES6. I misheard things while at the meeting.
/be
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-08-19T05:02:17.101Z)
Ok, then!
My apologies, Andreas, I was your champion in reviving refutable
patterns for destructuring in ES6. I misheard things while at the meeting.
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > >> Andreas Rossberg wrote: >>> As I said in my reply, I'm totally fine with what you describe in that >>> mail. But correct me if I'm wrong, that_is_ refutable destructuring, >>> isn't it? All you seem to drop is the optional irrefutable part (the >>> '?' feature). That's why I am quite confused about Brendan's statement >>> above. >> Possibly I missed something (I was at the meeting on the 2nd and 3rd days but not day 1). >> >> Allen, what does your latest draft do on >> >> var {p} = {}; >> >> Throw, or bind p to undefined? > > throws > > to bind to undefined you would say: > > var {p=undefined} = {}; Ok, then! My apologies, Andreas, I was your champion in reviving refutable patterns for destructuring in ES6. I misheard things while at the meeting. /be