> 1 There's no way I can create custom iterator abstraction (How can I can
> define MyCustomIterator.prototype[@@iterator] method?).
>
> 2. There's no straightforward way to consume iterators in generic way, e.g.
> I want to write function that works in similar way as Set constructor, and
> accepts any iterator implementation. I don't have a means to call
> iterator[@@iterator] method.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if it's the case, I think it's really
> important to open that.
>
> Maybe there should be Reflect.getIterator(obj) and
> Reflect.defineIterator(obj, getIterator) for that?
There will be a public symbol (that you can import from a system module) that will allow you to do both things.
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130828/589173d7/attachment-0001.html>
forbes at lindesay.co.uk (2013-08-28T09:05:25.981Z)
There will be a public symbol (that you can import from a system module) that will allow you to do both things.
