Rick Waldron (2013-08-28T21:40:07.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-08-31T20:58:19.708Z)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Forbes Lindesay <forbes at lindesay.co.uk> wrote: > It would be nice from a readability point of view if > `iteratable.toArray()` could always be used as a substitute for > `Array.from(iteratable)`. Since both `Array.from` and `[..spread]` already covers every single iterable and arraylike case now and forever, there is very little benefit (none?) in also specifying a `toArray` method on the prototype of every object that is capable of creating an iterable.