domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-09-08T01:15:30.882Z)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote: > In the end, I like neither wrapping nor capping. In my own work I've > preferred to define conditions under which certain rejections are > interpreted as program errors, thereby avoiding the wrapping/capping issue > entirely. (I can elaborate if anyone's interested.) Please do.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote: > > It's not clear to me why this, or your `Promise.throw`, is better than >> >> ```js >> somePromise.done(...) >> // or >> somePromise.then(...).done() >> ``` > > > Not *much* better, I'd say, but IMO a `done` method which accepts a > callback overlaps too much with `then`, and a `done` method without a > callback just looks like a wart in need of removal. : ) > > Visually, to me, wrapping beats capping. But that's just me. > > In the end, I like neither wrapping nor capping. In my own work I've > preferred to define conditions under which certain rejections are > interpreted as program errors, thereby avoiding the wrapping/capping issue > entirely. (I can elaborate if anyone's interested.) > Please do. > > { Kevin } > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130905/08449f0f/attachment-0001.html>