domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-09-08T01:11:20.471Z)
On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:40 , Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote: > Sorry, wrong link. I meant this one: http://mothereff.in/js-variables That's a nice page! But I doubt that developers will create such tools often enough to make a convenience function in the standard worthwhile. I proposed isIdentifierStart and isIdentifierPart because recognizing identifier characters across ECMAScript and Unicode versions requires large data tables; implementing the unescaping rules and filtering reserved words isn't all that hard.
On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:40 , Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote: > > On 5 Sep 2013, at 19:37, Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript at lindenbergsoftware.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 5, 2013, at 1:06 , Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote: >> >>> On 26 Aug 2013, at 04:08, Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript at lindenbergsoftware.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Aug 24, 2013, at 23:43 , Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would suggest adding something like `String.isIdentifier` which accepts a multi-symbol string or an array of code points to the strawman. Seems useful to be able to do `String.isIdentifier('foobar')` >>>> >>>> What would be the use case(s) for that? >>> >>> Tools like http://mothereff.in/js-escapes. >> >> I see nothing on that page about identifiers. > > Sorry, wrong link. I meant this one: http://mothereff.in/js-variables That's a nice page! But I doubt that developers will create such tools often enough to make a convenience function in the standard worthwhile. I proposed isIdentifierStart and isIdentifierPart because recognizing identifier characters across ECMAScript and Unicode versions requires large data tables; implementing the unescaping rules and filtering reserved words isn't all that hard. Norbert