Mark S. Miller (2013-09-12T13:35:57.000Z)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc.be at gmail.com> wrote:

> [+markm, allenwb]
>
> 2013/9/11 David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com>
>
>>  Le 11/09/2013 16:22, Tom Van Cutsem a écrit :
>>
>>   [[GetInheritance]] always checks whether the proxy and target's
>> prototype are the same, but as you pointed out, if the target is
>> extensible, you can set its prototype to some other object before returning
>> a value from the getPrototypeOf trap.
>>
>> It's annoying to cleanup post-trap though (to restore the target initial
>> prototype). Is the invariant on getPrototypeOf that important on extensible
>> objects?
>> I think it is the only trap that enforces something without a related
>> eternal invariant.
>>
>
> For membranes, when using a shadow target, there's no need to
> clean-up/restore anything.
>
> But more generally, you're right that it's odd [[GetInheritance]] is doing
> an invariant check on an otherwise extensible/configurable object. I think
> it's simply a remnant of the time before we fully embraced setPrototypeOf.
>

agreed


>
> Now that Object.setPrototypeOf is part of ES6, there doesn't seem to be a
> point in guaranteeing the stability of Object.getPrototypeOf for extensible
> objects.
>
> The important invariant is that getPrototypeOf remain stable for
> non-extensible objects.
>
> Hence, it seems we could replace steps 8-10 of Proxy.[[GetInheritance]] <
> https://people.mozilla.org/%7Ejorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-9.3.1> with:
>
> 8. Let extensibleTarget be the result of IsExtensible(target).
> 9. ReturnIfAbrupt(extensibleTarget).
> 10. If extensibleTarget is true, then return handlerProto.
> // steps below identical to the old steps 8-10:
> 11. Let targetProto be the result of calling the [[GetInheritance]]
> internal method of target.
> 12. ReturnIfAbrupt(targetProto).
> 13. If SameValue(handlerProto, targetProto) is false, then throw a
> TypeError exception.
>
> Mark, Allen, does that seem right?
>

yes.


>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130912/3a497b72/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-09-25T01:44:50.120Z)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc.be at gmail.com> wrote:

> But more generally, you're right that it's odd [[GetInheritance]] is doing
> an invariant check on an otherwise extensible/configurable object. I think
> it's simply a remnant of the time before we fully embraced setPrototypeOf.

agreed

> Mark, Allen, does that seem right?

yes.