domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-10-01T20:49:09.333Z)
On 09/24/2013 06:41 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > Regardless, this consensus is correctly recorded (confirmed word-for-word). If we should address LINE_SEPARATOR and PARA_SEPARATOR as well, then it's an agenda item for the future. Confirmed word-for-word with what? It's clear that we had different ideas about what the alleged consensus was. We agreed to normalize line terminators to LF. Nothing in the discussion led me to believe that we wouldn't be normalizing all line terminators.
On 09/24/2013 06:41 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com <mailto:brendan at mozilla.com>> wrote: > > Rick Waldron wrote: > > - Normalize CR, LF, and CRLF to LF > [WH: Is this consensus recorded correctly? I understood the consensus to be normalizing all lexical grammar LineTerminatorSequences to LF.] > > > TC39 members (including me) tend to forget, or turn a blind eye, toward LINE_SEPARATOR and PARA_SEPARATOR :-P. > > > Regardless, this consensus is correctly recorded (confirmed word-for-word). If we should address LINE_SEPARATOR and PARA_SEPARATOR as well, then it's an agenda item for the future. Confirmed word-for-word with what? It's clear that we had different ideas about what the alleged consensus was. We agreed to normalize line terminators to LF. Nothing in the discussion led me to believe that we wouldn't be normalizing all line terminators. Waldemar