domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-10-14T02:15:51.084Z)
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Michael Haufe <tno at thenewobjective.com> wrote: > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=discussion:date_literal_syntax > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:date_literal_syntax > > https://encrypted.google.com/#q=site:https%3A%2F%2Fmail.mozilla.org%2Fpipermail%2Fes-discuss%2F+%22date+literal%22 > Thanks for links but what is the conclusion?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Michael Haufe <tno at thenewobjective.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk <news at terrainformatica.com> > wrote: >> >> Quite often Date values are used in data exchanges in form of JS >> literals or JSON. >> >> It would be beneficial if JS (and JSON as derivative) will have an >> ability to represent dates literally . For example: >> >> { >> eventType: "meeting", >> eventStarts: 2014-11-05T13:15:30Z, >> eventDurationHours: 4 >> } >> ... > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=discussion:date_literal_syntax > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:date_literal_syntax > > https://encrypted.google.com/#q=site:https%3A%2F%2Fmail.mozilla.org%2Fpipermail%2Fes-discuss%2F+%22date+literal%22 > Thanks for links but what is the conclusion? -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com