Mathias Bynens (2013-10-11T08:14:19.000Z)
Forwarding Marijn’s message since he’s not subscribed to es-discuss.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Marijn Haverbeke <marijnh at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive
> Date: 10 October 2013 11:13:34 CEST
> To: Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript at lindenbergsoftware.com>
> Cc: Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be>, es-discuss <es-discuss at mozilla.org>, Anton Kovalyov <anton at kovalyov.net>, Yusuke SUZUKI <utatane.tea at gmail.com>, ariya.hidayat at gmail.com, Jeremy Ashkenas <jashkenas at gmail.com>, mihai at bazon.net
> 
> I have no particular opinion about this. Identifiers with obscure
> characters tend to be so rare that I don't expect to have any trouble
> with this except for constructed conformance tests. Since you'll
> probably be the people who are going to construct such tests, I'll
> leave you to figure out what's sane.
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-10-14T02:21:52.353Z)
Forwarding Marijn’s message since he’s not subscribed to es-discuss.

Begin forwarded message:


> From: Marijn Haverbeke <marijnh at gmail.com>
> 
> I have no particular opinion about this. Identifiers with obscure
> characters tend to be so rare that I don't expect to have any trouble
> with this except for constructed conformance tests. Since you'll
> probably be the people who are going to construct such tests, I'll
> leave you to figure out what's sane.