No worries guys - thanks for adding the 'obsolete' note
@angustweets
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Domenic Denicola <
> domenic at domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
>
>> From: es-discuss [es-discuss-bounces at mozilla.org] on behalf of Angus
>> Croll [anguscroll at gmail.com
>>
>> > Also (to all) deleting or marking as obsolete all wiki-harmony docs
>> that no longer meet the standard would save a lot of wasted hours
>>
>
> @Angus, I'm sorry this happened, I try to keep up with marking wiki docs'
> status as best as I can.
>
>
>>
>> I know Rick has already made strides in that direction via warnings like
>>
>> > "This API is superseded by the newer direct proxies API."
>>
>> or
>>
>> > This proposal has progressed to the Draft ECMAScript 6 Specification
>> (Sept. 2013 draft Sections 9.3 and 26.2), which is available for review
>> here: specification_drafts. Any new issues relating to them should be filed
>> as bugs at http://bugs.ecmascript.org. The content on this page is for
>> historic record only and may no longer reflect the current state of the
>> feature described within.
>>
>> But I somewhat agree that the warnings are not scary enough. Something
>> drastic like moving the entire page to "obsolete:proxies" would be nice.
>> But, eh, broken links :-/.
>>
>
> I'm all for suggestions to make it _even_ _more_ _clear_, as long as those
> suggestions don't break links (as Domenic has mentioned here). Currently,
> the "old" proxy proposals are stricken on the harmony:proposals page and
> the direct proxies proposal includes the "progressed to draft" text.
>
> FWIW, I've added "The content on this page is OBSOLETE" to the three
> oldest proxy proposals.
>
> @Tom - since you know the status of the more recent Proxy wiki pages
> better than I do, would you mind adding the same h1 text to those that fit
> the description of "obsolete"? Thanks!
>
> Rick
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131018/81cbe89f/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-10-26T03:13:49.396Z)
No worries guys - thanks for adding the 'obsolete' note
