Brendan Eich (2013-11-11T01:45:00.000Z)
Mark S. Miller wrote:
>
>
>     Another way to go is far higher precedence, say
>     LeftHandSideExpression? That avoids all arithmetic operators,
>     unary and binary.
>
>
> If we go with the highest plausible precedence, we can always lower it 
> later. Not vice versa.

Yep -- I'm warming up to LeftHandSideExpression. It allows new and call 
forms, member expressions, primary expressions, but not unparenthesized 
ternary, binary or unary operators -- and (crucially for the bug) not 
anything ending in AssignmentExpression. Allen?

/be
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-11-13T17:00:45.478Z)
Yep -- I'm warming up to LeftHandSideExpression. It allows new and call 
forms, member expressions, primary expressions, but not unparenthesized 
ternary, binary or unary operators -- and (crucially for the bug) not 
anything ending in AssignmentExpression. Allen?