Oliver Hunt (2013-11-11T20:07:16.000Z)
I thought @@unscopeables were (essentially) Symbols, have i been confused?  Are we overloading @@ to mean different things?

—Oliver

On Nov 11, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
> On 11/11/13 2:47 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
> Alas in addition to assuming that the Arguments object does not have the Array prototype, ExtJS also relies on the Array prototype not containing a property named values.
> 
> So, it seems that we’ll need to remove .values from the Array prototype.
> 
> Oliver,
> 
> Just to check, have you read the existing threads on the topic and on possible proposed solutions?  Starting at https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-June/031390.html for example, and I'm pretty sure it's been discussed since as well...
> 
> 
> Right—this is why we have @@unscopeables.
> 
> 
> Rick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131111/e0a28277/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-11-12T19:40:20.331Z)
I thought @@unscopeables were (essentially) Symbols, have i been confused?  Are we overloading @@ to mean different things?