For reference, i’ve just removed the API from JSC.  Default iterator still does the right thing.

—Oliver

On Nov 11, 2013, at 12:51 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
> Right, but the revised spec. for @@unscopables isn't in the Rev21 draft.   
> 
> See https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908 for the changes that will be in Rev22.
> 
> 
> Sorry, I misread this, please ignore my previous response.
> 
>  
> Allen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 11, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
>> On 11/11/13 2:47 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>> Alas in addition to assuming that the Arguments object does not have the Array prototype, ExtJS also relies on the Array prototype not containing a property named values.
>> 
>> So, it seems that we’ll need to remove .values from the Array prototype.
>> 
>> Oliver,
>> 
>> Just to check, have you read the existing threads on the topic and on possible proposed solutions?  Starting at https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-June/031390.html for example, and I'm pretty sure it's been discussed since as well...
>> 
>> 
>> Right—this is why we have @@unscopeables.
>> 
>> 
>> Rick
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131111/ce6f9a25/attachment-0001.html>

For reference, i’ve just removed the API from JSC.  Default iterator still does the right thing.