I like it. If there is a desire to stay closer to <script> I could see
<script module> and <script module="">
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> <3 this, it matches my go-back-to-1995 dreams.
>
> /be
>
> > On Nov 16, 2013, at 9:14 PM, David Herman <dherman at mozilla.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 16, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Matthew Robb <matthewwrobb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Does this imply <module src=""> ?
> >
> > Works either way, inline or external. (Requiring src="" is one of the
> reasons why <script async> was a non-starter.)
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
--
- Matthew Robb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131116/324e1b7f/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-11-17T18:18:53.039Z)
I like it. If there is a desire to stay closer to `<script>` I could see `<script module>` and `<script module="">`
