Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> I honestly forget how we decided to go for let at start of statement 
>> followed by [ -- but I do recall we agreed not to have 
>> name-binding-sensitive parsing(!). I.e., we would not look for 'var 
>> let = ...' and treat 'let' in that (hoisted) scope as a non-keyword.
>
> http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-expression-statement 
> <http://people.mozilla.org/%7Ejorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-expression-statement> 
>
>
> let [...
>
> is not an ExpressionStatement.  I requires two token look-ahead for 
> this one special case.

Thanks. I should have looked -- at this point es6-draft seems to have 
almost all of the wanted answers. Great work, keep going!

/be

Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-expression-statement 
>
> ```js
> let [...
> ```
>
> is not an ExpressionStatement.  I requires two token look-ahead for 
> this one special case.

Thanks. I should have looked -- at this point es6-draft seems to have 
almost all of the wanted answers. Great work, keep going!