Brendan Eich (2013-12-12T19:44:06.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-12-24T23:44:46.170Z)
Alex Russell wrote: > No. So "No" to all? You want `arguments` and `yield` in arrow functions working on the immediately enclosing arrow? Whatever the `await` answer, we need a systematic approach or rule of thumb for the other forms. > I'll continue to point out that the confusion is largely a product of > language lawyering, not real-world expectations of JS behavior. > Banning await here is only a solution if you're also not going to ban > an async descriptor on the arrow expression. THAT is the mistake. Lawyer Alex, esq, could you please answer the question of what `arguments` in an arrow should do? `yield` in an arrow?