ES Discuss - Message History

Brendan Eich (2013-12-12T19:46:23.000Z)

Go to Source

Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Putting aside my immediate esthetic reaction, I suggest we consider 
> one of
>
>     =>, *=>, !=>

We went over these at the last TC39 meeting. The *=> and !=> forms are 
future-hostile to elided empty parameter list for arrow.

>     =>, =*>, =!>

We didn't consider these carefully, just kind of threw up in our mouths 
a little. Probably we should consider again.

>     =>, *>, !>

Losing the = hurts, and starts getting too line-noisy.

/be

domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-12-24T23:45:25.550Z)

Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Putting aside my immediate esthetic reaction, I suggest we consider 
> one of
>
>     =>, *=>, !=>

We went over these at the last TC39 meeting. The `*=>` and `!=>` forms are future-hostile to elided empty parameter list for arrow.

>     =>, =*>, =!>

We didn't consider these carefully, just kind of threw up in our mouths 
a little. Probably we should consider again.

>     =>, *>, !>

Losing the = hurts, and starts getting too line-noisy.

Edit