Discuss
  • Message History
Tab Atkins Jr. (2013-12-13T18:08:30.000Z)
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> John Barton wrote:
>>
>> offline Mark lured me in to making more suggestions. I bit:
>>
>> p1 >< foo(a,b);  // p1 "eventually when the sand runs out" foo(a,b);
>> p1 <> foo(a,b); // Because a wikipedia page has diamond for temporal logic
>> 'eventually'.
>>
>> I guess angle brackets in general are trouble however, I recall some
>> issues with <html> and JS.
>
>
> Probably best to avoid <>, although in HTML, only </ followed by certain
> letters would be a problem ;-).

Yeah, nothing wrong with <> inside of <script> blocks.  So long as we
never define a </script> operator we're okay.

~TJ
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2013-12-24T23:48:49.409Z)
> Probably best to avoid <>, although in HTML, only </ followed by certain letters would be a problem ;-).

Yeah, nothing wrong with <> inside of <script> blocks.  So long as we never define a </script> operator we're okay.
forbes at lindesay.co.uk (2013-12-21T09:41:42.044Z)
> Probably best to avoid <>, although in HTML, only </ followed by certain letters would be a problem ;-).

Yeah, nothing wrong with <> inside of <script> blocks.  So long as we

never define a </script> operator we're okay.
Edit