thanks


On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:

> raul mihaila wrote:
>
>> Btw, are private names still in? I couldn't find them in the html version
>> of the latest draft.
>>
>
> You can tell that private names are *not* in by noticing the strawman:
> namespace in the wiki, not the harmony: namespace.
>
> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:private_names
>
> I don't think it's wise to build on them yet. The objections are recorded
> in es-discuss and meeting notes:
>
> http://esdiscuss.org/topic/private-names-in-text-javascript
>
> etc.
>
> /be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131214/419e4d9e/attachment.html>

thanks