>
>
>> "Name" is good.
>>
>> Symbol.name(Symbol.for("foo")) === "foo";
>>
>> Or some variant thereof.
>>
>
> I like this, but it interferes with the name property that all function
> objects have—the Symbol.name property would no longer have the expected
> value "Symbol".
>
>
Oh yes - doh! : )
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131222/879dfe4d/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-03T17:11:59.603Z)
> > >> "Name" is good. >> >> Symbol.name(Symbol.for("foo")) === "foo"; >> >> Or some variant thereof. >> > > I like this, but it interferes with the name property that all function > objects have—the Symbol.name property would no longer have the expected > value "Symbol". > > Oh yes - doh! : ) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131222/879dfe4d/attachment.html>