Brendan Eich (2013-12-23T01:59:09.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-06T13:58:42.968Z)
Alex Kocharin wrote: > `Object.is()` looks like a perfect function for checking oddballs (`-0`, > `NaN`) if you want to represent an arbitrary data correctly. In that > case distinguishing signed zeroes is a big plus or absolutely required. > (making `(-0).toString() === '-0'` would be better though). (Not backward compatible -- no one is going to risk this for so little gain.)