Discuss
  • Message History
Allen Wirfs-Brock (2013-12-31T22:30:53.000Z)
On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> David Bruant wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> I haven't had a use for a .reduce yet, but maybe that would make sense too?
> 
> Are Sets ordered just because for-of says so? :-P

Actually, according to the spec. they are ordered, but this is only currently observable via for-of. For-or was the motivation specifying an order, but other operations could make use of that ordering.

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131231/3150616c/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-06T14:15:47.269Z)
On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> Are Sets ordered just because for-of says so? :-P

Actually, according to the spec. they are ordered, but this is only currently observable via for-of. For-or was the motivation specifying an order, but other operations could make use of that ordering.
Edit