Discuss
  • Message History
Rick Waldron (2013-12-31T22:38:42.000Z)
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>wrote:

>
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
> David Bruant wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
> I haven't had a use for a .reduce yet, but maybe that would make sense too?
>
>
> Are Sets ordered just because for-of says so? :-P
>
>
> Actually, according to the spec. they are ordered, but this is only
> currently observable via for-of.
>

And the existing .forEach, right?

Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131231/155d03bd/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-06T14:15:59.791Z)
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>wrote:

> Actually, according to the spec. they are ordered, but this is only
> currently observable via for-of.

And the existing .forEach, right?
Edit