Kevin Smith (2014-01-09T17:35:12.000Z)
>
>
> I do have one usability concern with arrow IIFEs. I hate when I see them
> written as ()=>{...whatever...}() because you don't know that it's an IIFE
> until the end. Function expressions have the same issue. We should adapt
> Crock's recommended paren style to arrow IIFEs, to whit
> (()=>{...whatever...}()), even though this looses a bit more brevity.
>
>
I believe this is required by the grammar anyway.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140109/a346bd9d/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-14T17:49:53.348Z)
> I do have one usability concern with arrow IIFEs. I hate when I see them
> written as `()=>{...whatever...}()` because you don't know that it's an IIFE
> until the end. Function expressions have the same issue. We should adapt
> Crock's recommended paren style to arrow IIFEs, to whit
> `(()=>{...whatever...}())`, even though this looses a bit more brevity.
>
>

I believe this is required by the grammar anyway.