Kevin Smith (2014-01-20T02:03:08.000Z)
> I'm inclined to say this has missed the train for ES6.
>
> That may be fine.  It seems like we would use a little more experience
> with ES6 modules before we tackle this.
>

Definitely.  It appears that the only thing in the ES6 draft which mentions
standard modules is GeneratorFunction.  Will that be specified as a
property of the global object in the next draft?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140119/2cdea5db/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-24T19:59:40.996Z)
Definitely.  It appears that the only thing in the ES6 draft which mentions
standard modules is GeneratorFunction.  Will that be specified as a
property of the global object in the next draft?