domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-24T20:00:04.217Z)
On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Definitely. It appears that the only thing in the ES6 draft which mentions standard modules is GeneratorFunction. Will that be specified as a property of the global object in the next draft
It isn't clear that there much need for a global name for GeneratorFunction. If you really eed to access it can always get it via:
(function *() {}).constructor
(as the always helful generator UMO diagram at http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-generatorfunction-objects tells us)
The two names that I think are still up in the air (as to whether they are globals) are Realm and Loader
On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > > I'm inclined to say this has missed the train for ES6. > > That may be fine. It seems like we would use a little more experience with ES6 modules before we tackle this. > > Definitely. It appears that the only thing in the ES6 draft which mentions standard modules is GeneratorFunction. Will that be specified as a property of the global object in the next draft It isn't clear that there much need for a global name for GeneratorFunction. If you really eed to access it can always get it via: (function *() {}).constructor (as the always helful generator UMO diagram at http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-generatorfunction-objects tells us) The two names that I think are still up in the air (as to whether they are globals) are Realm and Loader Allen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140119/f87ff902/attachment.html>