ES Discuss - Message History

Brendan Eich (2014-01-20T17:39:53.000Z)

Go to Source

Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> It isn't clear that there much need for a global name for 
> GeneratorFunction.  If you really eed to access it can always get it via:
>
>    (function *() {}).constructor

Does this present a hazard for CSP, which provides policy controls 
governing Function?

I agree we shouldn't add a global GeneratorFunction -- not without a 
pressing use-case and evidence that we can get away with adding that global.

/be

domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-01-24T20:00:16.688Z)

Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> It isn't clear that there much need for a global name for 
> GeneratorFunction.  If you really eed to access it can always get it via:
>
>     (function *() {}).constructor

Does this present a hazard for CSP, which provides policy controls 
governing Function?

I agree we shouldn't add a global GeneratorFunction -- not without a 
pressing use-case and evidence that we can get away with adding that global.

Edit