Quildreen Motta wrote:
> I suppose using names that don't give you a hint of the meaning of the
> operation fits perfectly Haskell's (and Scalaz's) "Avoid Success At
> All Costs" tradition
lulz.
And so we will go with 'chain'.
/be
forbes at lindesay.co.uk (2014-02-08T16:56:24.431Z)
