ES Discuss - Message History

Erik Arvidsson (2014-02-08T16:00:46.000Z)

Go to Source

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Timothy Quinn <tim.c.quinn at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On a related note, one can only dream that formalized OOP class
> definitions can be put into the ECMAScript specification so we can move
> away from the lack of consistency for OOP. The flexibility is really
> hurting the language.
>

Your wish has come true.

http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-class-definitions


-- 
erik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140208/950c0bd6/attachment.html>

domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-02-10T22:36:50.420Z)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Timothy Quinn <tim.c.quinn at gmail.com> wrote:

> On a related note, one can only dream that formalized OOP class
> definitions can be put into the ECMAScript specification so we can move
> away from the lack of consistency for OOP. The flexibility is really
> hurting the language.
>

Your wish has come true.

http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-class-definitions

Edit