On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:33 PM, biscotte a la crevette
> <biscottealacrevette at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would like to suggest an alternative function declaration syntax rule :
> > http://pastebin.mozilla.org/4258633
> >
> > That will lead to a way shorter function declaration (like Array [...]
> > and Object {...} does ) :
> >
> > long story short : <...> will be equivalent to function(...)
> >
> > Which mean :
> >
> > var print = <name,age>{ //eq. to var print = function(name,age){...
> >   console.log("my name is " + name + " " + age + "y old.\n");
> > }
> >
> > Human = <name,age=0>{
> >     this.age=age;
> >     this.name=age;
> >     this.toString=<>{
> >         return ...
> >     };
> > }
> >
> > And so, will work with anonymous function declaration (which was my main
> goal).
> >
> > my_list.map(<val>{return val<0?-val:val;});//return absolut-ified array
> content
>
> Are you aware of the existing arrow functions?  Using current ES6,
> your example would be written as:
>
> my_list.map(val=>val<0?-val:val);
>

Also, there are short method declarations:

var obj = {
  foo(bar, baz) {
    // stuffs
  }
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140212/a5df7d63/attachment.html>

Also, there are short method declarations:

```js
var obj = {
  foo(bar, baz) {
    // stuffs
  }
}
```